<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.rssmicro.com/rssmicro.xsl" version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Corporate Tax Reform</title>
        <link>http://www.rssmicro.com/?q=Corporate+Tax+Reform&amp;f=0</link>
        <description>Real-time search results for Corporate Tax Reform</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:24:25 GMT</pubDate>
        
        <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.rssmicro.com/rss.web?q=Corporate+Tax+Reform" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <ttl>1440</ttl>
        <item>
            <title>Inside Apple's push for comprehensive corporate tax reform</title>
            <link>http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/20/inside-apples-push-for-comprehensive-corporate-tax-reform</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: appleinsider.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook testifies before the U.S. Senate this week, he will make his case for comprehensive &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt;, arguing that the current &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; system actually undermines the competitiveness of American companies. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/20/inside-apples-push-for-comprehensive-corporate-tax-reform</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Marineau: International Corporate Tax Reform</title>
            <link>http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2013/05/marineau-.html</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: taxprof.typepad.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Paul K. Marineau (Thomas Cooley), International &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt;: It's Time to "Walk-the-Talk" (No More Platypuses, Please), 40 Syracuse J. Int'l L. &amp; Com. 29 (2012): it is the position of this article that a well-designed and comprehensive full-inclusion &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; system for taxing a U.S. corporation's foreign-source income is the... ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2013/05/marineau-.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google’s chief supports corporate tax reform</title>
            <link>http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1026015.shtml</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.finfacts.ie --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eric Schmidt, Google’s executive chairman, on Sunday gave support to &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; - - quite a change from last December when he dismissed critics of &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; avoidance. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1026015.shtml</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Apple CEO Cook To Propose Major Corporate Tax Reform</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechnologyRss/~3/qIDhd2jHbvc/apple-ceo-tim-cook-to-testify-at-senate-tax-hearing.htm</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.investors.com --- Friday, May 17, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Washington wants to get its mitts on &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; America's offshore profits and Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to tell Congress what it'll need to do to get a share of it. Cook is scheduled to testify Tuesday at the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The hearing is set to start at 9:30 a.m. ET. Cook and two lieutenants, CFO Peter Oppenheimer and Phillip Bullock, head of &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; operations, are on the second of three panels called as witnesses. The hearing will examine "the structures and methods employed by multinational corporations to shift profits offshore and how such activities are affected by the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations," the agenda says . Apple (AAPL) is the poster child for hoarding foreign profits overseas. It has more than $100 billion in offshore cash and investments. Like other large companies, Apple sees little reason to repatriate those profits because they'd face a steep U.S. &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; bill if they did. In fact, Apple recently decided to borrow billions to pay for cash dividends and share buybacks because that made better financial sense than to bring foreign profits home. Cook has shared his talking points ahead of the hearing in interviews this week with Capitol Hill reporters. He will offer ideas for comprehensive &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt;. In an interview with Politico , Cook made it clear that Apple is not dodging any of its U.S. &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; liabilities. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechnologyRss/~3/qIDhd2jHbvc/apple-ceo-tim-cook-to-testify-at-senate-tax-hearing.htm</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Challenge of Corporate Tax Reform</title>
            <link>http://crfb.org/blogs/challenge-corporate-tax-reform</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: crfb.org --- Wednesday, May 08, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://crfb.org/sites/default/files/imagecache/blog_page_image/taxes_5.jpg" &amp; width="150" &amp; height="188" style="margin: 5pt 10px 0px 0px; float: left;"  border="1" align="left" alt="" /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; has many moving pieces to it and many questions that need to be answered. One question is whether the two pieces should be handled together, separately, or whether lawmakers should only do one or the other. &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; Policy Center's Donald Marron points out that it is much easier to consider stand-alone individual &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; than &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt;. While the individual &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; code in 2013 has more than $1.1 trillion worth of &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; expenditures, the &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; code has only $150 billion. A bigger issue is the fact that a sizeable portion of that $150 billion -- $81 billion -- is from &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; expenditures that benefit both corporations and pass-through businesses that are taxed through the individual code. Furthermore, the main &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt;-exclusive &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; expenditure is the deferral of foreign income for multinational companies, which is in some sense a design feature of the international &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; code that could be dealt with in a number of ways that don't involve elimination. If that &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; expenditure is left alone or only partially reduced, the prospect of dipping into &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; preferences that affect both types of businesses increases. In our &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; paper , we noted that reducing or eliminating "cross-over" &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; preferences raises questions of fairness with stand-alone &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt;, since pass-throughs are adversely affected by the base-broadening without the benefit of any potential rate reduction. Essentially, the pass-throughs would ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://crfb.org/blogs/challenge-corporate-tax-reform</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:07:54 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Study from Treasury Analysts Highlights Risk of Corporate Tax Reform Trap</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OffTheChartsBlog/~3/D3ElMaz-gc4/</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.offthechartsblog.org --- Tuesday, May 07, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.offthechartsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/5-7-13tax.jpg" &amp; width="150" &amp; height="210" style="margin: 5pt 10px 0px 0px; float: left;"  border="1" align="left" alt="" /&gt;We explained recently that &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; could become a trap if policymakers start by setting a &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; rate so low that they have trouble scaling back deductions and other preferences enough to offset the costs. If so, that &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; not only could fail the key test of reducing long-term deficits, but it actually could expand them. A new paper by Treasury Department analysts on the biggest business subsidy in the &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; code, “accelerated depreciation,” highlights the danger. This &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; break, which cost $22.5 billion in 2012, allows businesses to deduct over time the cost of investments like new equipment more quickly than those assets actually lose value. The analysis confirms that ending accelerated depreciation (so that businesses’ deductions had to more closely reflect the rate at which assets deteriorate) saves much less revenue in the second ten years (and even less in the ten years after that) than in the first ten years — the timeframe that Congress uses to assess legislation. (See graph.) In other words, a &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; rate cut that policymakers could pay for in the first ten years by ending accelerated depreciation would add billions to deficits over the long run. Policymakers should resist the temptation to rely on just such timing gimmicks to enact &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; that includes costly new cuts in &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; rates. Like ending accelerated depreciation, many other &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; reforms would raise more revenue in the first ten  ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OffTheChartsBlog/~3/D3ElMaz-gc4/</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stand-alone corporate tax reform faces a big practical challenge.</title>
            <link>http://www.facebook.com/taxpolicycenter/posts/10151379437066478</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.facebook.com --- Monday, May 06, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stand-alone &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; faces a big practical challenge. A Practical Challenge to Stand-Alone &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; www.taxpolicycenter.org Leaders in both parties appear to favor revenue-neutral &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; that would lower today's 35 percent &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; rate while slashing &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; breaks. Individual &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; appears much more contentious, so some observers wonder whether Congress might pursue &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; by itself, s... ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.facebook.com/taxpolicycenter/posts/10151379437066478</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:53:13 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Widespread corporate tax reform agreement, little chance for change</title>
            <link>http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/blog/morning_call/2013/05/widespread-corporate-tax-reform.html?ana=RSS&amp;amp;s=article_search</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: assets.bizjournals.com --- Friday, May 03, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a rare spasm of bipartisan agreement, President Barack Obama, Democrats, Republicans and business all agree &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Reform&lt;/b&gt; needs fixing, but no one wants a favorite slice of the pie to go away, The New York Times reports. The United States charges the highest &lt;b&gt;Corporate&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; rate of any industrialized nation, and politicians and business leaders alike agree it must be reformed, the report said. The rate now stands at 35 percent, and the 80 or so business &lt;b&gt;Tax&lt;/b&gt; exemptions totaled about $181… ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/blog/morning_call/2013/05/widespread-corporate-tax-reform.html?ana=RSS&amp;amp;s=article_search</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>OECD calls for corporate tax reform</title>
            <link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aad0297e-b020-11e2-8d07-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Fhome_uk%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.ft.com --- Sunday, April 28, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Netherlands attracted FDI of $3.5tn by the end of 2012 with stocks of $3.5tn, while Luxembourg booked $2.28tn in inbound foreign direct investment ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aad0297e-b020-11e2-8d07-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Fhome_uk%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>