<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.rssmicro.com/rssmicro.xsl" version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Candy Crowley</title>
        <link>http://www.rssmicro.com/?q=Candy+Crowley&amp;f=0</link>
        <description>Real-time search results for Candy Crowley</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
        
        <atom:link rel="self" href="http://www.rssmicro.com/rss.web?q=Candy+Crowley" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <ttl>1440</ttl>
        <item>
            <title>CNN's Candy Crowley Presses Rand Paul on IRS Targeting of Tea Party Groups</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FoxNewsInsider/~3/Oyl3s8BVJ1Q/cnns-candy-crowley-presses-rand-paul-irs-targeting-tea-party-groups</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: foxnewsinsider.com --- Wednesday, May 22, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bill O’Reilly and Bernie Goldberg criticized CNN’s &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; for an interview she did with Senator Rand Paul (R-KY). Amid the news that the IRS targeted Tea Party groups applying for tax-exempt status, &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; pressed Sen. Paul on if there was a possibility that the agency was not politically motivated. She cuts into Paul’s response to say, “Well they say it’s a mistake. The question is whether it’s political.” ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FoxNewsInsider/~3/Oyl3s8BVJ1Q/cnns-candy-crowley-presses-rand-paul-irs-targeting-tea-party-groups</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Candy Crowley Stricken With Sudden Amnesia on Benghazi</title>
            <link>http://crooksandliars.com/heather/candy-crowley-develops-case-amnesia-presid</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: crooksandliars.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://cdn.crooksandliars.com/files/movieimages/2013/05/27299.dl.jpg?key=1369055546" &amp; width="150" &amp; height="112" style="margin: 5pt 10px 0px 0px; float: left;"  border="1" align="left" alt="" /&gt;Click here to view this media I'm not sure what happened, but it appears &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; has either gotten tired of being beaten up on by right-wingers for being unfair to poor old Mittens during the presidential debates, or she's developed a really bad case of amnesia since she first stunned Romney by fact checking him when he claimed that President Obama did not call the attack in Libya an act of terror. Whatever the reason, she did a complete 180 and began the right's game of parsing the President's words when interviewing White House advisor Dan Pfeiffer this Sunday: CNN's &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; Adopts False Right-Wing Claim That Obama Didn't Call Benghazi A Terrorist Attack . Transcript via CNN below the fold. &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: Let me ask and turn you to Benghazi. When Susan Rice went on this show and all the other shows on Sunday, was the president aware of the talking points that we have seen sort of emerge over the last six months? PFEIFFER: Of the many things the president gets involved in, talking points for Sundays shows is not one of them. But what he was aware of was the consensus of the intelligence community at the time. &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: So, he was aware -- was he aware at the back and forth between the state department and -- (CROSSTALK) &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: None of that -- PFEIFFER: No, never -- no president would be involved in something like that. &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: So, he did say in an interview in CBS which we later learned after the election, but a week and a hal ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://crooksandliars.com/heather/candy-crowley-develops-case-amnesia-presid</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sen. Rand Paul on CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley - 5/19/13</title>
            <link>http://paul.senate.gov?p=video&amp;amp;id=811</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: paul.senate.gov --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt; ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://paul.senate.gov?p=video&amp;amp;id=811</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An alternative question would be why Candy Crowley chose to disrupt the debates...</title>
            <link>http://www.facebook.com/frontpagemag/posts/10151663067765871</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.facebook.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An alternative question would be why &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; chose to disrupt the debates with the false claim that Obama did say it was a terrorist attack &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: “Why Didn’t the President Just Say, Yeah, It Was a Terrorist Attack?” ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.facebook.com/frontpagemag/posts/10151663067765871</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Candy Crowley thinks we’ve forgotten how she helped sweep Benghazi under the rug</title>
            <link>http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/candy-crowley-thinks-weve-forgotten-how-she-helped-sweep-benghazi-under-the-rug/</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: dailycaller.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; thinks we've forgotten how she helped sweep Benghazi under the rug ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/candy-crowley-thinks-weve-forgotten-how-she-helped-sweep-benghazi-under-the-rug/</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:12:07 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oh, now Candy Crowley gets it…</title>
            <link>http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=98765</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: therealrevo.com --- Monday, May 20, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure, she jumps to Obama’s defense during the debate, contradicts Mitt Romney and incorrectly states that Obama did in fact say Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Now, the election safely in the bag, she asks “Why didn’t the president just say, yeah, it was a terrorist attack?” That clip at the end sickens me and I will never believe there wasn’t collusion between Obama and &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;. During the debate Romney hit Obama hard, Obama just snicked like Mitt is being led into an ambush and &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; jumps in like Obama’s tag team partner. It was worked out ahead of time Do you think that is far fetched? More far fetched than the IRS targeting conservatives coast-to-coast? Obama knew he was vulnerable on the Benghazi issue and knew it would come up during the debate. He knew his Rose Garden speech contained a single, off-hand mention of terror. It was just a generic use of the word but it was close enough and his people made sure that &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; was armed with the fact that he used the word. She used that information to shut down Mitt and defend Obama. It was dirty as hell and now &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; isn’t even pretending to support the fiction she inappropriately propagated during a presidential debate. Share Tweet ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=98765</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why does Candy Crowley still have a job?</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/CFfO/~3/tecw-WGK3zc/why-does-candy-crowley-still-have-job.html</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: leadandgold.blogspot.com --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And why is CNN treated as a serious news organization? Austin Bay: Four Pinocchios: A Cute Way of Saying Obama Lied Glenn Kessler, who writes the Washington Post's fact-checker column, now informs his readers that the president's claim he called the Benghazi attack an "attack of terrorism" rates four Pinocchios. That's Kessler's cute way of calling our president a complete and thorough liar . So now that claim is the worst sort of falsehood according to our professional fact checkers. What are we to say about &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;’s debate “moderation” when she “fact-checked” those lies as though they were true and Mitt Romney was misleading the public? And remember—her network and most of her media peers supported her actions. CNN circles the wagons (UPDATED) ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/CFfO/~3/tecw-WGK3zc/why-does-candy-crowley-still-have-job.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bwahahaha: CNN photoshops Candy Crowley but she still looks gross!</title>
            <link>http://www.mofopolitics.com/2013/05/19/bwahahaha-cnn-photoshops-candy-crowley-but-she-still-looks-gross/</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.mofopolitics.com --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://i.imgur.com/s3LZqBj.jpg" &amp; width="150" &amp; height="72" style="margin: 5pt 10px 0px 0px; float: left;"  border="1" align="left" alt="" /&gt;On Sunday, Obama-worshiping sycophant &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; invited Senator Rand Paul on her “program” so that he could listen to her read Obama talking points… State of the Union May 19. What media bias? And now, the sexist portion of this “article”: CNN’s highly-regarded graphics department work tirelessly to make &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; appear less disgusting, but to no avail… Ew, gross! ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.mofopolitics.com/2013/05/19/bwahahaha-cnn-photoshops-candy-crowley-but-she-still-looks-gross/</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>‘More Political Than Policy’? Candy Crowley Confronts Rand Paul Over Motivation Behind Hillary Criticism</title>
            <link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/more-political-than-policy-candy-crowley-confronts-rand-paul-over-motivation-behind-hillary-criticism/</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.mediaite.com --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-Shot-2013-05-19-at-3.59.48-PM.png" &amp; width="150" &amp; height="98" style="margin: 5pt 10px 0px 0px; float: left;"  border="1" align="left" alt="" /&gt;Broaching the topic on Benghazi on this week’s State of the Union , host &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; challenged guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) over his criticism of Hillary Clinton . Pointing to the timing of Paul’s stating she should not be able to hold “higher office,” &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; asked him about the “danger that this looks a lot more political than policy.” &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; recalled Paul’s remarks in Iowa (“which we all know that has a political overlay”), where he said Clinton’s “inexcusable” handling of Benghazi “ should preclude her from holding higher office.” “When you make remarks like that — and you may make similar ones when you go to New Hampshire, another place with great political overlay — doesn’t it undercut the idea that this is about policy?” she asked. Paul said he “absolutely sticks by them,” pointing to the “Black Hawk Down” incident in Somalia, after which Defense Secretary Les Aspin was reportedly asked to resign. “But nobody asked him to do it in Iowa or New Hampshire,” &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; interjected. She stuck with the point about how Paul’s remarks came during trips to politically important states, which gives it a political aspect. Asked if that’s “helpful,” Paul countered, “I’ve done it in every state in every stop — because I think it’s pretty important that she accept blame for not providing security.” “Whether it has political overtones or not,” he added, “it really goes to the heart of who you are as secretary of state if you do not provi ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/more-political-than-policy-candy-crowley-confronts-rand-paul-over-motivation-behind-hillary-criticism/</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>palintwibe: via http://t.co/yM5zhM7dQ2 Video: CNN's fawning parasite Candy Crowley ask Rand Paul... http://t.co/5wrLzMBLgO #palin</title>
            <link>http://www.twibes.com/group/Palin?tweet_id=336202732421652500</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.twibes.com --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;palintwibe: via http://t.co/yM5zhM7dQ2 Video: CNN's fawning parasite &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; ask Rand Paul... http://t.co/5wrLzMBLgO #palin ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.twibes.com/group/Palin?tweet_id=336202732421652500</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rand Paul on "State of The Union" w / Candy Crowley - CNN - 5-19-13</title>
            <link>http://www.dailypaul.com/285966/rand-paul-on-state-of-the-union-w-candy-crowley-cnn-sunday-5-19-13-check-local-listing</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: www.dailypaul.com --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rand Paul on "State of The Union" w / &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; - CNN - 5-19-13 Paul: We Need to Treat Tripoli and Benghazi Like Baghdad http://youtu.be/A4Cpdv296M4 IRS Scandal: &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt;: Is it Possible This Isn't Political and IRS Didn't Intend to Harass the Tea Party? http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/&lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt;-... ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://www.dailypaul.com/285966/rand-paul-on-state-of-the-union-w-candy-crowley-cnn-sunday-5-19-13-check-local-listing</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn't Political and IRS Didn't Intend to Harass the Tea Party?</title>
            <link>http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/candy-crowley-it-possible-isnt-political-and-irs-didnt-intend-harass-</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font color="Gray"&gt;Source: newsbusters.org --- Sunday, May 19, 2013&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Can you see in your mind's eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn't intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN's &lt;b&gt;Candy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b&gt;Crowley&lt;/b&gt; of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary): read more ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/candy-crowley-it-possible-isnt-political-and-irs-didnt-intend-harass-</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>