RSSMicro.com Search - RSS Feed Search Engine - RSS Feed Directory
Dedicated RSS Feed Search Engine
 Search 2.1 million RSS feeds
The most comprehensive RSS feed search on the web
Top Stories  |  FeedRank Checker

Published

   Last Hour

   Last Day

   Past Week

   Past Month

 Anytime







Featured
RSS Feeds


CNN RSS Feeds

Reuters RSS Feeds

MSNBC RSS Feeds

New York Times RSS Feeds

Washington Post RSS Feeds

CNBC RSS Feeds

ABC News RSS Feeds

Fox News RSS Feeds

Sky News RSS Feeds

Forbes RSS Feeds

CNET RSS Feeds

Unicef RSS Feeds

PBS RSS Feeds

Wall Street Journal RSS Feeds

Financial Times RSS Feeds

Business Week RSS Feeds

Bloomberg RSS Feeds

TheStreet RSS Feeds

ESPN RSS Feeds

   


Calculate your site FeedRank Today

FeedRank - RSSMicro Search

FeedRank, a newly developed algorithm for ranking RSS feeds only on RSSMicro
Click here to learn more




FeedRank: 1/10  1/10  Low  ---  neurodojo.blogspot.com
...

 

 
Saturday, April 26, 2008 --- 90 days ago
The following is a blog post I made over at the All in the Mind blog in response to a recent show on evolutionary psychiatry. I wanted to post it here, because I've been wanting to discuss the "reptilian brain" idea for some time, as it may well be one of the most popular but wrong ideas about the evolution of nervous systems out there. More posts on reptile brains later, I hope. ;;;;; The basic premise discussed in this show -- that human behaviour has an evolutionary history -- is not terribly contentious. The specific model discussed in the program, Paul MacLean's "triune brain," is more problematic. As typically expressed, MacLean's model suggests that entire reptilian brain has been conserved through the evolution of the mammals, with new brain regions essentially added on to the existing core, like suburbs being added to a city. There are a few problems with this model. First, MacLean's ideas seem to be highly influenced by old ideas that emphasized the "march of progress" or the "great chain of being." In particular, the MacLean model seems to be based on the notion that reptiles were the ancestors of mammals. It's debatable whether reptiles are the ancestors of mammals, however. It may be that the two groups shared a common ancestor, then diverged. It's also somewhat misleading in that it lumps all reptiles together. Snakes, for instance, appear much later in the fossil record than the earliest mammals . Second, the ...




Recent Posts





 Facebook     Del.icio.us     Digg     StumbleUpon     Reddit     Google
Copyright © 2008 RSSMicro.com