RSSMicro.com Search - RSS Feed Search Engine - RSS Feed Directory
Dedicated RSS Feed Search Engine
 Search 2.1 million RSS feeds
The most comprehensive RSS feed search on the web
Top Stories  |  FeedRank Checker

Published

   Last Hour

   Last Day

   Past Week

   Past Month

 Anytime







Featured
RSS Feeds


CNN RSS Feeds

Reuters RSS Feeds

MSNBC RSS Feeds

New York Times RSS Feeds

Washington Post RSS Feeds

CNBC RSS Feeds

ABC News RSS Feeds

Fox News RSS Feeds

Sky News RSS Feeds

Forbes RSS Feeds

CNET RSS Feeds

Unicef RSS Feeds

PBS RSS Feeds

Wall Street Journal RSS Feeds

Financial Times RSS Feeds

Business Week RSS Feeds

Bloomberg RSS Feeds

TheStreet RSS Feeds

ESPN RSS Feeds

   


Calculate your site FeedRank Today

FeedRank - RSSMicro Search

FeedRank, a newly developed algorithm for ranking RSS feeds only on RSSMicro
Click here to learn more


Techdirt


FeedRank: 5/10  5/10  Good  ---  www.techdirt.com
Easily digestible tech news... ...

 

 
Thursday, May 15, 2008 --- 71 days ago
Three years ago, reporter Tom Foremski tossed out his idea for how Microsoft could kill Google in an underhanded way: offer $100 million to whoever clicked on a random Google ad. The trick would be that no one (other than the person administering the prize at Microsoft) would know what the ad is. Foremski's theory was that this would lead to massive clickfraud and anger from Google advertisers. Of course, there are a lot of assumptions in there that likely wouldn't hold up in a real world test (with the biggest being that the whole deal would stop working the second someone "won"). However, now we've got Mark Cuban tossing out a suggestion for how to take down Google that seems to come from the same "wishful thinking" playbook. Cuban's idea is that Microsoft (with Yahoo) should offer to pay the top 100,000 sites in Google to get them to remove themselves from Google, and agree to be "exclusively" in the Yahoo/Microsoft listing. The idea is that the money would serve to pay for the lost traffic from Google -- but that's highly speculative. If Microsoft actually tried this, it would be quite difficult for the Justice Department not to call an antitrust foul, first of all. But, at a more practical level, it just wouldn't work. It's based on the false premise that those top 100k sites are really the only sites that matter. If they all disappeared from Google's index, another 100k would quickly fill in to replace th ...




Recent Posts





 Facebook     Del.icio.us     Digg     StumbleUpon     Reddit     Google
Copyright © 2008 RSSMicro.com