RSSMicro.com Search - RSS Feed Search Engine - RSS Feed Directory
Dedicated RSS Feed Search Engine
 Search 2.1 million RSS feeds
The most comprehensive RSS feed search on the web
Top Stories  |  FeedRank Checker

Published

   Last Hour

   Last Day

   Past Week

   Past Month

 Anytime







Featured
RSS Feeds


CNN RSS Feeds

Reuters RSS Feeds

MSNBC RSS Feeds

New York Times RSS Feeds

Washington Post RSS Feeds

CNBC RSS Feeds

ABC News RSS Feeds

Fox News RSS Feeds

Sky News RSS Feeds

Forbes RSS Feeds

CNET RSS Feeds

Unicef RSS Feeds

PBS RSS Feeds

Wall Street Journal RSS Feeds

Financial Times RSS Feeds

Business Week RSS Feeds

Bloomberg RSS Feeds

TheStreet RSS Feeds

ESPN RSS Feeds

   


Calculate your site FeedRank Today

FeedRank - RSSMicro Search

FeedRank, a newly developed algorithm for ranking RSS feeds only on RSSMicro
Click here to learn more




FeedRank: 5/10  5/10  Good  ---  thecurrent.theatlantic.com
...

 

 
Thursday, May 08, 2008 --- 78 days ago
John McCain delivered a speech on his judicial philosophy on Tuesday. It's no surprise that liberals hated John McCain's speech on the judiciary on Tuesday, while conservatives ( mostly ) liked it. But it's disappointing that the speech didn't break any new ground in the debate over judicial nominations. McCain can be refreshingly clear when it comes to subjects that our political debate tends to constrict. Not this time. McCain criticized the use of code words to obscure judicial principles, but his speech was loaded with him. "Activist judge" is about as transparent a code phrase as there is: to everyone in politics, it means that the judge is a liberal. For liberals, meanwhile, "judicial restraint" has come to mean the inevitable erosion of individual liberty --- the judge in question must be conservative. Never mind the fact that conservative justices are often accused (and accuse each other) of being too activist on some issues, or that liberal justices often hide weak law behind the shield of precedent. This is not to say that justices are dishonest or hypocritical -- just that the language we use to evaluate them is impoverished. Voters care about outcomes, but judicial nominees and their elite defenders pretend to argue about fuzzy principles, in the hopes of masking the fact that they are arguing about outcomes. McCain shouldn't sanction this fiction. His judicial vision isn't limited to the binary question ...




Recent Posts





 Facebook     Del.icio.us     Digg     StumbleUpon     Reddit     Google
Copyright © 2008 RSSMicro.com