RSSMicro.com Search - RSS Feed Search Engine - RSS Feed Directory
Dedicated RSS Feed Search Engine
 Search 4.3 million RSS feeds
The most comprehensive RSS feed search on the web
Top Stories  |  FeedRank Checker

Published

   Last Hour

   Last Day

   Past Week

   Past Month

 Anytime







Featured
RSS Feeds


CNN RSS Feeds

Reuters RSS Feeds

MSNBC RSS Feeds

New York Times RSS Feeds

Washington Post RSS Feeds

CNBC RSS Feeds

ABC News RSS Feeds

Fox News RSS Feeds

Sky News RSS Feeds

Forbes RSS Feeds

CNET RSS Feeds

Unicef RSS Feeds

PBS RSS Feeds

Wall Street Journal RSS Feeds

Financial Times RSS Feeds

Business Week RSS Feeds

Bloomberg RSS Feeds

TheStreet RSS Feeds

ESPN RSS Feeds

   




FeedRank - RSSMicro Search

FeedRank, a newly developed algorithm for ranking RSS feeds only on RSSMicro
Click here to learn more




FeedRank: 3/10  3/10  Fair  ---  classactiondefense.jmbm.com
Published by Michael Hassen of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro LLP ...

 

 



Sunday, August 17, 2008 --- 108 days ago
Judicial Panel Grants Defense Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, Unopposed by Certain Class Action Plaintiffs but Opposed by Others, but Concludes Class Actions should be Transferred to Southern District of Florida Eighteen class actions were filed in 14 different federal district courts against various defendants, including Bayer Corp., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer AG, and Bayer Healthcare AG (collectively “Bayer”), alleging product liability claims based on the safety of the Bayer drug Trasylol. In re Trasylol Products Liab. Litig. , ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. April 7, 2008) [Slip Opn., at 1]. Additionally, another 18 class action lawsuits had been filed and were treated as tag-along cases by the court. Id. , at 1 n.2. Defense attorneys for Bayer filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the District of Connecticut or, alternatively, the Northern District of Georgia. Id. , at 1. Plaintiffs in 6 of the class actions before the court and in 2 of the potential tag-along cases supported pre-trial coordination, but argued for various other districts as the appropriate transferee court; plaintiffs in 4 of the class actions before the court an in one of the potential tag-along cases opposed centralization. Id. The Judicial Panel grante ...
Related Content

Expanded  |  Mixed  |  Popular







Recent Posts





 Facebook     Del.icio.us     Digg     StumbleUpon     Reddit     Google
Copyright © 2008 RSSMicro.com